JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE 104 5.5 and pH 7.0. Results of a crossover trial in healthy volunteers, Acta. Derm.Venereol., 70, 429–431 (1990). ( 29) D. Bajpai and V. K. Tyagi, Laundry detergents: an overview, J. Oleo Sci., 56, 327–340 (2007). ( 30) J. B. St. Laurent, F. de Buzzaccarini, K. De Clerck, H. Demeyere, R. Labeque, R. Lodewick, and L. van Langenhove, “Laundry Cleaning of Textiles,” in Handbook for Cleaning/Decontamination of Surfaces, I. Johansson and P. Somasundaran. Eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007), pp. 57–102. ( 31) K. Bucher, K. E. Bucher, and D. Walz, Irritant actions of unphysiological pH values. A controlled pro- cedure to test for topical irritancy, Agents Actions, 9, 124–132 (1979). ( 32) K. P. Ananthapadmanabhan, D. J. Moore, K. Subramanyan, M. Misra, and F. Meyer, Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing, Dermatol. Ther., 17(Suppl. 1), 16–25 (2004). ( 33) K. P. Ananthapadmanabhan, A. Lips, C. Vincent, F. Meyer, S. Caso, A. Johnson, K. Subramanyan, M. Vethamuthu, G. Rattinger, and D. J. Moore, pH-induced alterations in stratum corneum properties, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 25, 103–112 (2003). ( 34) E. Kim, S. Kim, G. W. Nam, H. Lee, S. Moon, and I. Chang, The alkaline pH-adapted skin barrier is disrupted severely by SLS-induced irritation, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 31, 263–269 (2009). ( 35) T. Knor, A. Meholjić-Fetahović, and A. Mehmedagić, Stratum corneum hydration and skin surface pH in patients with atopic dermatitis, Acta. Dermatovenerol. Croat., 19, 242–247 (2011). (36) M. H. Schmid-Wendtner and H. C. Korting, The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function, Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 19, 296–302 (2006). (37) C. Prakash, P. Bhargava, S. Tiwari, B. Majumdar, and R. K. Bhargava, Skin surface pH in acne vulgaris: insights from an observational study and review of the literature, J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol., 10, 33–39 (2017). (38) S. Ono, R. Imai, Y. Ida, D. Shibata, T. Komiya, and H. Matsumura, Increased wound pH as an indicator of local wound infection in second degree burns, Burns, 41, 820–824 (2015). (39) H. Kurabayashi, K. Tamura, I. Machida, and K. Kubota, Inhibiting bacteria and skin pH in hemiple- gia: effects of washing hands with acidic mineral water, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 81, 40–46 (2002). (40) H. Jang, A. Matsuda, K. Jung, K. Karasawa, K. Matsuda, K. Oida, S. Ishizaka, G. Ahn, Y. Amagai, C. Moon, S. H. Kim, P. D. Arkwright, K. Takamori, H. Matsuda, and A. Tanaka, Skin pH is the master switch of kallikrein 5-mediated skin barrier destruction in a murine atopic dermatitis model, J. Invest. Dermatol., 136, 127–135 (2016). (41) C. Selander, A. Zargari, R. Möllby, O. Rasool, and A. Scheynius, Higher pH level, corresponding to that on the skin of patients with atopic eczema, stimulates the release of Malassezia sympodialis allergens, Allergy, 61, 1002–1008 (2006). (42) E . Uhoda, V. Goffi n, and G. E. Piérard, Responsive corneosurfametry following in vivo skin precondi- tioning, Contact Dermatitis, 49, 292–296 (2003). (43) M. Paye, Y. Cartiaux, V. Goffi n, and G. E. Piérard, Hand and forearm skin: comparison of their respec- tive responsiveness to surfactants, Skin Res. Technol., 7, 78–83 (2001). (44) L. Said, J. Serup, and C. Rebel, Epidermal calcium release (ECR) in vivo sampled with a simple washout chamber technique, Skin Res. Technol., 8, 219–226 (2002). (45) E. Berardesca, D. Fideli, P. Gabba, M. Cespa, G. Rabbiosi, and H. I. Maibach, Ranking surfactant skin irritancy in vivo in man using the plastic occlusion stress test (POST), Contact Dermatitis, 23, 1–5 (1990). (46) J. L. Antoine, J. L. Contreras, and D. J. Van Neste, pH infl uence of surfactant-induced skin irritation. A non-invasive multiparametric study with sodium lauryl sulfate, Derm. Beruf Umwelt, 37, 96–100 (1989). (47) H. C. Korting, M. Megele, L. Mehringer, D. Vieluf, H. Zienicke, G. Hamm, and O. Braun-Falco, Infl u- ence of skin cleansing preparation acidity on skin surface properties, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 13, 91–103 (1991). (48) R. I. Murahata, R. Toton-Quinn, and M. B. Finkey, Effect of pH on the production of irritation in a chamber irritation test, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 18, 62–66 (1988). (49) K. Ertel, Modern skin cleansers, Dermatol. Clin., 18, 561–575 (2000). (50) F. Yamaguchi, S. Watanabe, F. Harada, M. Miyake, M. Yoshida, and T. Okano, In vitro analysis of the effect of alkyl-chain length of anionic surfactants on the skin by using a reconstructed human epidermal model, J. Oleo Sci., 63, 995–1004 (2014). (51) L. C. Gerhardt, A. Lenz, N. D. Spencer, T. Münzer, and S. Derler, Skin-textile friction and skin elasticity in young and aged persons, Skin Res. Technol., 15, 288–298 (2009). (52) T. J aeger, M. Rothmaier, H. Zander, J. Ring, J. Gutermuth, and M. D. Anliker, Acid-coated textiles (pH 5.5–6.5)—a new therapeutic strategy for atopic eczema? Acta. Derm. Venereol., 95, 659–663 (2015).

MILDNESS OF LAUNDRY DETERGENTS DIFFERING IN pH 105 (53) J. D emetrulias, T. Donnelly, V. Morhenn, B. Jessee, S. Hainsworth, P. Casterton, L. Bernhofer, K. Martin, and D. Decker, Skin2—an in vitro human skin model: the correlation between in vivo and in vitro testing of surfactants, Exp. Dermatol., 7, 18–26 (1998). (54) B. G abard, E. Chatelain, E. Bieli, and S. Haas, Surfactant irritation: in vitro corneosurfametry and in vivo bioengineering, Skin Res. Technol., 7, 49–55 (2001). (55) A. N atsch, C. A. Ryan, L. Roertsch, R. Emter, J. Jaworska, F. Gerberick, and P. A. Kern, A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation, J. Appl. Toxi- col., 33, 1337–1352 (2013). (56) D. A . Basketter, J. F. McFadden, F. Gerberick, A. Cockshott, and I. Kimber, Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH, Contact Dermatitis, 60, 65–69 (2009). (57) K. R . Mewes, A. Fischer, N. N. Zöller, V. Laubach, A. Bernd, A. Jacobs, A. van Rompay, M. Liebsch, R. Pirow, and D. Petersohn, Catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method based on an open source reconstructed epidermis (phase I), Toxicol. In Vitro, 36, 238–253 (2016). (58) H. Sa kaguchi, C. Ryan, J. M. Ovigne, K. R. Schroeder, and T. Ashikaga, Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials, Toxicol. In Vitro, 24, 1810–1820 (2010). (59) T. Fu jimura, Y. Takagi, I. Sugano, Y. Sano, N. Yamaguchi, T. Kitahara, Y. Takema, and R. L. Rizer, Real-life use of underwear treated with fabric softeners improves skin dryness by decreasing the friction of fabrics against the skin, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 33, 566–571 (2011). (60) G. E. Piérard, J. E. Arrese, C. Rodriguez, and P. A. Daskaleros, Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin, Contact Dermatitis, 30, 286–291 (1994). (61) G. E. Piérard, J. E. Arrese, A. Dowlati, P. A. Daskaleros, and C. Rodriguez, Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on infant skin, Int. J. Dermatol., 33, 138–141 (1994).