326 IOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS Beets and Theimer (21) asked a number of men and women to characterize three of these substances, including androstenone itself, with a set of predeter- mined adjectives. Women found the odours to be more often sweaty than men. Men in turn used the terms animal and sexual more often. Both groups qualified the odours most frequently as a urine odour. Differences in these kinds of experiments may be due in part to experience and socio-cultural factors like a female hesitance to use the term 'sexual'. Furthermore the state of health of the subject and his absolute threshold, which for the sense of taste was found to be correlated with preferences, may play a role (Kaplan (22)). In some studies differences in preference might be due to differences in sensitivity. Griffiths and Patterson (8) using 5a-androst-16-en-3-one found that women judged the smell of it significantly more unpleasant. Furthermore they found that the more sensitive a subject was the greater was his or her dislike of the odour, but within groups with the same threshold women disliked the odour more than did men. Fischer (23) also found that men liked the odour of a natural musk more than women did. CONCLUDING REMARKS In all cases in which sex differences are found these differences seem to be more pronounced for substances like musks which are used as sexual attractants in the animal world or for substances like androstenone and related steroids which are also clearly sex-linked. Male odours are usually characterized as musky, which was corroborated recently by Russell (24) who found that the sex of a person can be determined by the odour of his clothing, and female odours are characterized as sweet. REFERENCES (I) Toulouse, E. and Vaschide, N. Mesure de l'odorat chez l'homme et chez la femme. C. r. Soc. Biol. 51 381 (1899). (2) Le Magnen, J. Les ph6nom6nes olfacto-sexuels chez l'homme. Arch. ScL Physiol. 6 125 0 952). (3) Le Magnen, J. Les ph6nom•nes olfacto-sexuels chez le rat blanc. Arch. Sci. Physiol. 6 295 0952). (4) Pietras, R. J. and Moulton, D. G. Hormonal influences on odour detection in rats. Physiol. Behav. 12 475 0974). (5) Broverman, D. M., Klaiber, E. L., Kobayashi, Y. and Vogel, W. Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychol. Rev. 75 23 (1968). (6) Koelega, H. S. Extraversion, sex, arousal and olfactory sensitivity. Acta Psychol. 34 51 (1970). (7) Koelega, H. S. and K6ster, E. P. Some experiments on sex differences in odour perception. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 237 234 (1974).

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ODOUR PERCEPTION 327 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (2O) (21) (22) (23) (24) Griffiths, N.M. and Patterson, R. L. S. Human olfactory responses to 5a-androst-16-en-3- one-principal component of boar taint. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 21 4 (1970). Whissell-Buechy, D. and Amoore, J. E. Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive in- heritance. Nature 242 271 and 245 157 (1973). Comfort, A. Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive inheritance. Nature 245 157 (1973). Viefling, J. S. and Rock, J. Variations in olfactory sensitivity to Exaltolide during the menstrual cycle. J. Appl. Physiol. 22 311 (1967). Meixner, C. H. Changes in olfactory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle. Thesis, Brown University, Providence (1955). Kahn, R. J. Sensory threshold fluctuations as a function of menstrual cycle phase. Thesis, Yeshiva University, New York, U.S.A. (1965). Schneider, R. A. and Wolf, S. Olfactory perception thresholds for citral utilizing a new type olfactorium. J. AppL Physiol. 8 337 (1955). K6ster, E. P. Olfactory sensitivity and the menstrual cycle. Inst. Rhinol. 3 57 (1965). K6ster, E. P. Olfactory sensitivity and ovulatory cycle duration. Olfactologia 1 43 (1968). Amoore, J. E., Peppleworth, J. R. and Whissell-Buechy, D. Sensitivity of women to musk odor: no menstrual variation. J. Chem. Ecol. 1 291 (1975). Schiffman, S. Personal communication (1976). Good, P. R., Geary, N. and Eugen, T. The effect of oestrogen on odour detection. Chemi- cal senses and flavour (1976). (To be published.) Moncrieff, R. W. Odour preferences (1966) (Leonard Hill, London). Beets, M. G. J. and Theimer, E. T. Odour similarity between structurally unrelated odorants. In: Ciba Foundation Symposium on taste and smell in vertebrates. (Ed. by G. E. W. Wolsten- holme and J. Knight) (J. & A. Churchill, London) (1970). Kaplan, A. R. In: Progress in human behaviour genetics (Ed. by S. G. Vandenberg) (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, U.S.A.) (1968). Fischer, R. In: Gustation and offaction (Ed. by M. R. Kare and O. Maller) (Academic Press, London) (1971). Russell, M. J. Human olfactory communication. Nature 260 520 (1976)