140 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE will most likely cause less edema, but a larger volume of gel needs to be injected to achieve the same results as a less saturated gel.5,27,28 CONCLUSIONS This review intended to gather the most relevant information on the properties of HA present in available literature. Besides being the most abundant polysaccharide in the human skin, HA as a biomaterial shows a promising role in different areas of medicine (most predominantly from an aesthetic point of view), with HA fillers being used to perform tissue lifting, but also being used as a healing agent, thanks to its effects on fibroblasts and other cells. Therefore, it is crucial to have an intricate understanding of HA’s rheology and physicochemical properties, which will influence its clinical outcomes. There is not one universal dermal filler adequate for all patients and anatomical areas, rather there are multiple products with slight differences in said properties. Viscoelasticity (and especially the elastic modulus—G’), cross-linking, HA concentration, cohesivity, particle size, and hydrophilic expansion are some of the most important and influential factors to consider, especially since they all impact one another. All these factors have a role in defining HA’s longevity, expansion and lifting capacity, biocompatibility, and behavior in the patient’s tissues. Despite this, there is little research that presents a truly detailed and integral description of all of HA’s characteristics. Due to this and the growing concern for aesthetics and effective tissue regeneration methods, it is important for future research to further explore this area and establish better defined protocols. REFERENCES (1) Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A. Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2008 3(1):153–159. (2) Zhao X. Synthesis and characterization of a novel hyaluronic acid hydrogel. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006 17(4):419–433. (3) Lee DY, Cheon C, Song S, et al. Influence of molecular weight on swelling and elastic modulus of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Polym Korea. 2015 39(6):80–976. (4) Wu GT, Kam J, Bloom JD. Hyaluronic acid basics and rheology. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2022 30(3):301–308. (5) Clark CP, III. Animal-based hyaluronic acid fillers: scientific and technical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 120(6)(suppl):27S–32S. (6) Wang HM, Chou YT, Wen ZH, Wang CZ, Chen CH, Ho ML. Novel biodegradable porous scaffold applied to skin regeneration. PLOS ONE. 2013 8(6):e56330. (7) Hashemi SS, Rajabi SS, Mahmoudi R, Ghanbari A, Zibara K, Barmak MJ. Polyurethane/chitosan/ hyaluronic acid scaffolds: providing an optimum environment for fibroblast growth. J Wound Care. 2020 29(10):586–596. (8) Noh I, Kim GW, Choi YJ, et al. Effects of cross-linking molecular weights in a hyaluronic acid- poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel network on its properties. Biomed Mater. 2006 1(3):116–123. (9) Hu M, Yang J, Xu J. Structural and biological investigation of chitosan/hyaluronic acid with silanized- hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as an injectable reinforced interpenetrating network hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Drug Deliv. 2021 28(1):607–619. (10) Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 4(7):528–539.
141 HYALURONIC ACID AESTHETIC FILLERS (11) Salwowska NM, Bebenek KA, Żądło DA, Wcisło-Dziadecka DL. Physiochemical properties and application of hyaluronic acid: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 15(4):520–526. (12) Marinho A, Nunes C, Reis S. Hyaluronic acid: a key ingredient in the therapy of inflammation. Biomolecules. 2021 11(10):1518. (13) Fahmy HM, Aly AA, Abou-Okeil A. A nonwoven fabric wound dressing containing layer-by-layer deposited hyaluronic acid and chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 114:929–934. (14) Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008 10(1):35–42. (15) Edsman KLM, Öhrlund Å. Cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers: correlation between cohesion and other physicochemical properties. Dermatol Surg. 2018 44(4):557–562. (16) Fundarò SP, Salti G, Malgapo DMH, Innocenti S. The rheology and physicochemical characteristics of hyaluronic acid fillers: their clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 23(18):10518. (17) Choi MS. Basic rheology of dermal filler. Arch Plast Surg. 2020 47(4):301–304. (18) Kablik J, Monheit GD, Yu L, Chang G, Gershkovich J. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2009 35(suppl 1):302–312. (19) Lee W, Hwang SG, Oh W, Kim CY, Lee JL, Yang EJ. Practical guidelines for hyaluronic acid soft-tissue filler use in facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2020 46(1):41–49. (20) Ghorbani F, Zamanian A, Behnamghader A, Daliri Joupari M. Bioactive and biostable hyaluronic acid- pullulan dermal hydrogels incorporated with biomimetic hydroxyapatite spheres. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 112:110906. (21) Ryu C, Lu JE, Zhang-Nunes S. Response of twelve different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of recombinant human hyaluronidase. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 74(4):881–889. (22) Fallacara A, Manfredini S, Durini E, Vertuani S. Hyaluronic acid fillers in soft tissue regeneration. Facial Plast Surg. 2017 33(1):87–96. (23) De Boulle K, Glogau R, Kono T, et al. A review of the metabolism of 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether- crosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2013 39(12):1758–1766. (24) Rohrich RJ, Bartlett EL, Dayan E. Practical approach and safety of hyaluronic acid fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 7(6):e2172. (25) Michaud T. Rheology of hyaluronic acid and dynamic facial rejuvenation: topographical specificities. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 17(5):736–743. (26) Fagien S, Bertucci V, von Grote E, Mashburn JH. Rheologic and physicochemical properties used to differentiate injectable hyaluronic acid filler products. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 143(4):707e–720e. (27) La Gatta A, Schiraldi C, Zaccaria G, Cassuto D. Hyaluronan dermal fillers: efforts towards a wider biophysical characterization and the correlation of the biophysical parameters to the clinical outcome. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 13:87–97. (28) La Gatta A, De Rosa M, Frezza MA, Catalano C, Meloni M, Schiraldi C. Biophysical and biological characterization of a new line of hyaluronan-based dermal fillers: A scientific rationale to specific clinical indications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 68:565–572. (29) Edsman K, Nord LI, Ohrlund A, Lärkner H, Kenne AH. Gel properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2012 38(7 Pt 2):1170–1179. (30) Philipp-Dormston WG, Hilton S, Nathan M. A prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational, postmarket study of the use of a 15 mg/mL hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the lips. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014 13(2):125–134. (31) Wongprasert P, Dreiss CA, Murray G. Evaluating hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A critique of current characterization methods. Dermatol Ther. 2022 35(6):e15453. (32) Gutowski KA. Hyaluronic acid fillers: science and clinical uses. Clin Plast Surg. 2016 43(3):489–496. (33) Zerbinati N, Lotti T, Monticelli D, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biosafety of hyaluronic acid PEG cross- linked with micromolecules of calcium hydroxyapatite in low concentration. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 6(1):15–19.
Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown) From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)