FORMULATION COMPOSITION ON CONDITIONING SHAMPOO PERFORMANCE 421 Figure 8. Model predictions for cationic polymer deposition: (A) cationic cassia polymers CC1.0, CC2.3, and CC3.0 (B) cationic guar CG0.98 and (C) cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose PQ-10 1.03.
JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE 422 Figure 9. Prediction profi ler for cationic cassia polymer deposition (CC3.0, CC2.3, and CC1.9). Figure 10. Interaction profi les for cationic cassia polymer deposition (CC3.0, CC2.3, and CC1.9). ionic strength. The total amount of surfactant does not have a statistically signifi cant infl u- ence on the silicone deposition of cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose. No statistically signifi - cant interactions between ionic strength, surfactant amount, and micelle charge were identifi ed by the model.
Previous Page Next Page 
Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown)
From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)