LUXURY CUES OF CREAM HEIGHTEN THE REWARD VALUE 89 ACKNOWLEDGM ENTS We would li ke to thank the participants in this study and Mika Nakayama for applying the skincare cream as a beauty specialist. The present work was entirely funded by the Shiseido Global Innovation Center and Tokyo Metropolitan University. The authors re- port no confl icts of interest. Because of the confi dentiality agreements with the partici- pants, the data in this study are available only at the Shiseido Global Innovation Center and Tokyo Metropolitan University. REFERENCES (1) N. Hirao , M. Noriuchi, H. Isobe, and Y. Kikuchi, Luxury cues facilitate the connection between social dominance and reward mediated by the lateral prefrontal cortex, J. Cosmet. Sci., 71(1), 37–45 (2020). (2) P. Tanej a , H. Olausson, M. Trulsson, P. Svensson, and L. Baad-Hansen, Defi ning pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Res. (2019). doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01253-8. (3) A. Tai, R . Bianchini, and J. Jachowicz, Texture analysis of cosmetic/pharmaceutical raw materials and formulations, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 36(4), 291–304 (2004). (4) I. Morri s on, ALE meta-analysis reveals dissociable networks for affective and discriminative aspects of touch, Hum. Brain Mapp., 37, 1308–1320 (2016). (5) N. Apaydı n , S. Üstün, E. H. Kale, İ. Çelikağ, H. D. Özgüven, B. Baskak, and M. Çiçek, Neural mech- anisms underlying time perception and reward anticipation, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 12, 115 (2018). (6) C. McCabe, E. T. Rolls , A. Bilderbeck, and F. McGlone, Cognitive infl uences on the affective represen- tation of touch and the sight of touch in the human brain, Soc. Cognit. Affect Neurosci., 3, 97–108 (2008). (7) M. Schaefer, H. Berens , H. J. Heinze, and M. Rotte, Neural correlates of culturally familiar brands of car manufacturers. Neuroimage, 31, 861–865 (2006). (8) M. Schaefer and M. Rot t e, Thinking on luxury or pragmatic brand products: brain responses to different categories of culturally based brands, Brain Res, 1165, 98–104 (2007). (9) M. Schaefer, Neuroecon o mics: in search of the neural representation of brands, Prog. Brain Res., 178, 241–252 (2009). (10) M. Schaefer and M. Ro t te, Combining a semantic differential with fMRI to investigate brands as cul- tural symbols, Soc. Cognit. Affect Neurosci., 5, 274–281 (2010). (11) B. Deen, N. B. Pitske l , and K. A. Pelphrey, Three systems of insular functional connectivity identifi ed with cluster analysis, Cerebr. Cortex, 7, 1498–1506 (2011). (12) F. Kurth, K. Zilles, P . T. Fox, A. R. Laird, and S. B. Eickhoff, A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis, Brain Struct. Funct., 214, 519–534 (2010). (13) P. Wei and R. Bao, The role of insula-associated brain network in touch. BioMed Res. Int., 2013, 734346 (2013). (14) D. M. Ellingsen, J. Wessberg, M. Eikemo, J. Liljencrantz, T. Endestad, H. Olausson, and S. Leknes, Placebo improves pleasure and pain through opposite modulation of sensory processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 17993–17998 (2013). (15) M. Shirato, Y. Kikuchi, A. Machida, T. Inoue, and M. Noriuchi, Gentle touch opens the gate to the primary somatosensory cortex, Neuropsychiatry, 8, 1696–1707 (2018).