Study Parameters measured Method Measurement method Skin area studied Time, w C. asiatica product Placebo/ comparatorp AEs/dropouts Tongsrikeaw (21) Wrinkle Digital camera Rao-goldman 15 mm lateral from lateral canthus 0 3.48 ± 0.55 3.48 ± 0.55 ns 0 4 3.48 ± 0.55 3.48 ± 0.55 ns Five-point visual score 8 3.42 ± 0.55 3.44 ± 0.54 0.7 12 3.38 ± 0.53 3.42 ± 0.54 0.5 Measured at w 12 15 mm below lower eyelid 0 3.36 ± 0.55 3.36 ± 0.55 NS 4 3.36 ± 0.55 3.36 ± 0.55 NS 8 3.32 ± 0.55 3.34 ± 0.54 0.6 12 3.30 ± 0.54 3.32 ± 0.54 0.6 Visioscan VC98 Skin wrinkles 15 mm lateral from lateral canthus 0 58.6 ± 6.6 58.3 ± 6.0 0.6 4 56.8 ± 5.9 56.6 ± 5.9 0.7 8 54.1 ± 5.9 53.9 ± 5.9 0.7 12 51.9 ± 5.9 51.4 ± 6.2 0.5 15 mm below lower eyelid 0 56.2 ± 7.1 54.9 ± 6.9 0.1 4 54.1.±6.9 53.3 ± 6.7 0.2 8 50.2 ± 6.2 49.7 ± 6.7 0.002 12 47.1 ± 5.6 46.6 ± 6.6 0.5 Satisfaction Patient satisfaction questionnaire Patient satisfaction score 15 mm from lateral canthus. 15 mm below lower eyelid 12 3.52 ± 1.05 3.36 ± 0.99 NA AEs Visual observation Either site 4 No AE No AE 8 No AE No AE 12 No AE No AE Table III Continued EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CENTELLA ASIATICA 447
Study Parameters measured Method Measurement method Skin area studied Time, w C. asiatica product Placebo/ comparatorp AEs/dropouts Zhang et al. (22) Periorbital wrinkles Photos assessed by nine dermatologists 10-point scale Crow’s feet 0 3.4 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.4 4 3.0 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.4 0.02 8 2.6 ± 1.2 3.2 ± 1.3 0.001 One dropout work- related cause 12 2.5 ± 1.2 3.3 ± 1.4 0.001 AEs, NR Visioscan VC98 SEw-value Crow’s feet 12 Increased decreased 0.05 Self-assess-ment Coarse and fi ne wrinkles Crow’s feet 12 Only fi ne wrinkles improved 0.05 * p compare intervention with placebo/comparator . **Lee et al., not clear what these numbers mean (see comments in the article). Table III Continued JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE 448
Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown) From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)