766 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS regarding these secondary tests is that, whereas several are likely to provide interesting information on the effect of a substance on the skin, insufficient experience seems to have been gained from using them to be able to recom- mend their adoption routinely. Since animal tests are essential in the initial screening for primary skin irritants, some basic research into the reactions of animal skin compared with human skin is required. This information is likely to enhance the value of initial predictive tests greatly and to facilitate the extrapolation of the data to man. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I acknowledge the encouragement and advice given by the Director, Dr. R. F. Crampton, and the assistance of Dr. Joan Hardy, Dr. K. Butter- worth and Dr. P. Grasso in the preparation of the manuscript. (Received: 11th May 1972) (1) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) REFERENCES Carter, R. O and Griffith, J. F. Experimental basis for the realistic assessment of safety of topical agents. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 7 60 (1965). Fisher, A. A. Contact dermatitis (1968) (Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia). Rostenberg, A. Cutaneous reactions from cosmetics. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 11 170 (1960). Rostenberg, A. Methods for the appraisal of the safety of cosmetics. Drug Cosmet. Ind. 88 592 (1961). Rieger, M. M. and Battista, G. W. Some experiences in the safety testing of cosmetics. J. $oc. Cosmet. Chem. 15 161 (1964). Calnan, C. D. The significance of assay method for the dermatologist. Brit. J. Dermatol. 82 43 (1970). Jadassohn, J. Verh. Deut. Derm. Ges. V. Kongr. 103 (1896). Bloch, B. Experimentelle Studien ueber das Wesen der Jodoformidiosynkrasie. Z. Exp. Path. Therap. 9 509 (1911). Bloch, B. Referate ueber Ekzem Pathogenese. Arch. Dermatol. Syphilol. 145 34 (1924). Draize, J. H., Woodard, G. and Calvary, H. O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. t'harmacol. Exp. Ther. 82 377 (1944). Kligman A.M. Evaluation of cosmetics for irritancy. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. $uppl. 3 30 (1969). Wolven, A. and Levenstein, I. Techniques for evaluating dermal irritation. J. $oc. Cosmet. Chem. 18 199 (1967). Kligman, A.M. and Wooding, W. M. A method for the measurement and evaluation of irritants on human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 49 78 (1967). Wooding, W. M. and Opdyke, D. L. A statistical approach to the evaluation of cutaneous responses to irritants. J. $oc. Cosmet. Chem. 18 809 (1967). Levenstein, I. and Wolven, A. Evaluating the dermal toxicity test of the FDA. Amer. Perfum. Cosmet. 80 64 (1965). Schmid, O. Tierexperimentelle Untersu6hungen zur Hautvertraeglichkeit. J. $oc. Cosmet. Chem. 21 835 (1970).

APPRAISAL OF METHODS FOR DETECTING PRIMARY SKIN IRRITANTS 767 (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) 25) 26) 27) (28) (29) (30) Elliott, G. A. and Gray, J. E. Morphologic effects of mildly irritating topical agents. Toxic. ,,!ppl. _Pharmacol. 16 362 (1970). Skog, E. Irritant effect of industrial hand cleaners. A comparative investigation on guinea pig and human skin. ,'!rch. Environ. Health. 7 682 (1963). Shelley, W. B. The patch test. J./liner. Med. Ass. 200 874 (1967). Holland, B. D., Cox, W. C. and Dehne, E. J. Prophetic patch test. A. M. A./lrch. Dermatol. Syphilol. 61 611 (1950.) Anderson, W. A., Shatin, H. and Canizares, O. Influence of varying physical factors on patch tests. J. Invest. Dermatol. 30 77 (1957). Rostenberg, A. Primary irritant and allergic eczematous reactions. Arch. Dermatol. 75 547 (1957). Wells, F. V. and Lubowe, I. I. Cosmetics and the skin (1964) (Reinhold Publishing Cor- poration, New York). Lanman, B. M. The role of human patch testing in product development progracnme. -Proc. Joint. Conf. Cosmet. Sci. Washington D.C. 135 (1968). Idson, B. Primary irritation testing. Toxicol./lppl. _Pharmacol. Suppl. 3 84 (1969). Fernstrom, A. I. B. Patch test studies. Acta Dermato-Venerol. 34 203 (1954). Fernstrom, A. I. B. Patch test studies. Acta Dermato-Venerol. 35 420 (1955). Bett, D.C. G. and Calnan, C. D. Studies in contact dermatitis. 1. General principles in patch testing. Trans. Rep. St John's Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 39 20 (1957). Rokstad, I. A new modification of the patch test (the chamber method). Arch. Dermatol. Syphilol. 41 649 (1940). Rokstad, I. Skin reactions caused by fractions of oil of turpentine and hexanitro diphenyl- amine. Experimental investigation by means of adhesion chamber method. Acta. Dermato- Venerol. 26 (1946). (31) Haberlein, J. B., Oliver, R. M. and Rostenberg, A. Studies on the eczematous sensitiza- tion. J. Invest. Dermatol. 10 27 (1948). (32) Epstein, E. Detection of neomycin sensitivity. A comparison of testing techniques. Arch. Dermatol. 91 50 (1965). (33) Siegal, J M. and Meltzer, L. Patch tests versus usage tests with special reference to volatile ingredients. Arch. Dermatol. 57 660 (1948). (34) Maibach, H. I. & Epstein, W. L. Predictive patch testing for sensitization and irratation. /liner. _Perrum. Cosmet. 80 55 (1965). (35) Stoughton, R. B. Percutaneous absorption. Southwestern Med. J. 55 1134 (1962). (36) Gordon, B. I. and Maibach, H. I. Adhesive tape anhidrosis. Arch. Dermatol. 100 429 (1969). (37) Turner, R. H., Kurban, A. K. and Ryan, T. J. Fibrinolytic activity in the ski• following epidermal injury. J. Invest. Dermatol. 53 458 (1969). (38) Sulzberger, M. B. and Witten, W. H. Thin pliable plastic films in topical dermatologic therapy. Arch. Dermatol. 84 1027 (1961). (39) Klauder, J. V. Patch test study to determine cutaneous reaction to new compounds. Arch. Environ. Health. I 407 (1960). (40) Diengdoh, J. V. and Chayen, J. A histochemical study of experimentally induced malig- nant skin turnours. Brit. J. Dermatol. 81 835 (1969). (41) Major, I. R. Correlation of initial changes in the mouse epidermal cell population with two stage carcinogenesis--a quantitative study. Brit. J. Cancer 24 149 (1970). (42) Elgjo, K. Epidermal cell population kinetics after a single application of some hyper- plasia producing substances. Eur. J. Cancer 3 519 (1968). (43) Barnes, J. M. and Denz, F. A. Experimental methods used in determining chronic toxicity. _Pharmacol. Rev. 6 191 (1954). (44) Rostenberg, A. and Haeberlin, J. B. Eczematous sensitizations. III. The development in species other than man or the guinea-pig. J. Invest. Dermatol. 15 233 (1950). (45) Brunner, M. J. Pitfalls and problems in predictive testing. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 18 323 (1967). (46) Somers, G. F. Testing drugs for dermal toxicity. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 14 1 (1963). (47) Finkelstein, P., Laden, K and Miechowski, W. Laboratory methods for evaluating skin irritancy. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 7 74 (1965). (48) Brown, V. K. H. A comparison of predictive irritation tests with surfactants on human and animal skin. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 22 411 (1971). (49) ldson, B. Topical toxicology and testing. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 57 I (1968). (50) Brown, V. K. H. Laboratory animals for dermatological research. J. Inst. Anhn. Tech. 17 122 (1966).