178 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS diazolidinyl urea Figure 3. Electropherogram for shampoo (10%). Sample preparation and experimental conditions given in text. external standards agreed well with that obtained by standard additions. Three deter- minations ofdiazolidinyl urea in the gel yielded 0.31%, 0.29%, and 0.26% by external standards, and 0.28%, 0.31%, and 0.30% by the method of standard additions. Table II shows the results of diazolidinyl urea determination in a variety of products. Although the recipe is not exactly known for these products, the values obtained are consistent with formulations of this type. CORROBORATION OF DIAZOLIDINYL UREA FOUND WITH PARABEN LEVELS The levels of diazolidinyl urea found in Table II for the shampoo and the douche are consistent with the incorporation of 0.5% of the combination preservative diazolidinyl urea (and) methyl paraben (and) propyl paraben (and) propylene glycol (Sutton Labora- tories/ISP, Chatham, NJ). Both of these products are formulated with this multicom- ponent preservative, which consists of 30% diazolidinyl urea, 11% methyl paraben, and 3% propyl paraben (remainder propylene glycol). Because the level of diazolidinyl urea is linked to the level of parabens, one can determine whether the level of parabens is consistent with the level of diazolidinyl urea found by this method. The level of methyl and propyl paraben in the shampoo, determined by HPLC, is 0.050% and 0.015%, respectively. This corroborates with the value of diazolidinyl urea determined in the shampoo by CE. That is, methyl and propyl paraben should be ca. 33% and 10%, respectively, of the amount of diazolidinyl urea found (based on the combination preservative formula).

DETERMINATION OF DIAZOLIDINYL UREA 179 diazol idinyl urea Figure 4. Electropherogram for hand lotion (5%). Sample preparation and experimental conditions given in text. PRECISION Fit of standard additions curve. The average correlation coefficient (r 2) for the six replicate analyses of the hand lotion was 0.9907 -- 0.0081. For the six replicates of the pain- relieving gel, the average r 2 was 0.9971 q- 0.0019. Elution time. The average elution time of diazolidinyl urea for the twelve runs of the analysis of the burn-relief gel sample was 4.12 min -- 0.023 min (C.V. = 0.57%). The same treatment for the vitamin E/lanolin hand lotion gave an average elution time of 3.97 min q- 0.026 min (C.V. = 0.65%). Peak area. Standard solutions of 0.01, 0.02, and 0.05 % diazolidinyl urea were run three times each. The coefficient of variation for each set of runs was 3%. A 5% solution