345 Photoprotective Effects of Carotenoid
octylmethoxycinnamate and oxybenzone), they not only help to stabilize the chemical filters,
but they also help to lower the concentrations of chemical filters used in sunscreen.40,41
Therefore, synergistic UV protection efficacy of the carotenoid extract from R kroppenstedtii
with low concentrations of commercial sunblocks could be studied in future.
STABILITY OF THE CREAM
The stability test results (Table V) indicate that the formulation was stable during storage
and there was no phase separation, no change in pH, and no presence of rancidity. Generally,
the pH of a cosmetic cream should be in the range of 5 to 7. It is important to note that
acidic or alkaline pH may result in skin irritation and also influences the hydration rate
of polymer.29 In the present study, the formulated cream’s pH was found to be within the
range of cosmetic standards and also favored the skin’s pH requirements.
Considering the acceptability criteria,37,38 the sunscreen formulation containing 10%
carotenoid extract displayed stable test parameters at the end of the study period (30 days).
CONCLUSION
The present study is a preliminary investigation on the use of carotenoid derived from an
indigenous isolate, R kropenstedtii, as an active component in a sunscreen formulation. In
preformulation studies, the carotenoid extract displayed DPPH radical scavenging and ferric
reducing potential with no evident cytotoxicity against HaCaT cell lines. The formulated
sunscreen containing 10% carotenoid extract exhibited good stability and moderate broad
spectrum UV protection potential. The findings suggest that carotenoid derived from R
kroppenstedtii could be used as a potential photoprotectant. Thus, a sunscreen based on
microbe-derived UV filters is a low-cost, long-term, and safe UV protection alternative.
To determine if a microbe-derived carotenoid may be utilized as an acceptable sunscreen
ingredient, future studies on the assessment of in vivo safety and other regulatory guidelines
must be taken into account.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Dr. Sanjeev Waghmare, Scientific officer, ACTREC,
Kharghar, India for providing HaCaT cell line for this study.
Table V
Stability Evaluation of Formulated Sunscreen
Parameters Bc BcCE
0 days 30 days 0 days 30 days
Thermal stability No liquefaction No liquefaction No liquefaction No liquefaction
Centrifugation test No phase
separation
No phase
separation
No phase
separation
No phase
separation
Rancidity test Negative Negative Negative Negative
pH 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
346 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
REFERENCES
(1) Ginzburg AL, Blackburn RS, Santillan C, Truong L, Tanguay RL, Hutchison JE. Zinc oxide-induced
changes to sunscreen ingredient efficacy and toxicity under UV irradiation. Photochem Photobiol Sci.
2021 20(10):1273–1285. doi:10.1007/s43630-021-00101-2.
(2) Schneider SL, Lim HW. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active
ingredients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 80(1):266–271. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.033.
(3) Downs CA, Kramarsky-Winter E, Segal R, et al. Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter,
oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its environmental
contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016 70(2):265–288.
doi:10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7.
(4) Kim S, Choi K. Occurrences, toxicities, and ecological risks of benzophenone-3, a common component of
organic sunscreen products: a mini-review. Environ Int. 2014 70:143–157. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.015.
(5) Krause M, Klit A, Blomberg Jensen M, et al. Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of
endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int J Androl. 2012 35(3):424–436. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.​
2012.01280.x.
(6) Schneider SL, Lim HW. A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. Photodermatol
Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019 35(6):442–446. doi:10.1111/phpp.12439.
(7) Sanches PL, Geaquinto LRO, Cruz R, et al. Toxicity evaluation of TiO2 nanoparticles on the 3D skin
model: A systematic review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 8:575. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00575.
(8) Subramaniam VD, Prasad SV, Banerjee A, et al. Health hazards of nanoparticles: understanding the
toxicity mechanism of nanosized ZnO in cosmetic products. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2019 42(1):84–93. doi:1
0.1080/01480545.2018.1491987.
(9) Nunes AR, Vieira ÍGP, Queiroz DB, et al. Use of flavonoids and cinnamates, the main photoprotectors
with natural origin. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2018 2018:5341487. doi:10.1155/2018/5341487.
(10) Chanchal D, Swarnlata S. Novel approaches in herbal cosmetics. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008 7(2):89–95.
doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00369.x.
(11) Mahajan U, Wasule D. Sunscreen and anti-oxidant activities of herbal gel formulations. Pharmacogn
Mag. 2008 4(13):99–101.
(12) Sathasivam R, Ki JS. A review of the biological activities of microalgal carotenoids and their potential
use in healthcare and cosmetic industries. Mar Drugs. 2018 16(1):26. doi:10.3390/md16010026.
(13) Pallela R, Na-Young Y, Kim SK. Anti-photoaging and photoprotective compounds derived from marine
organisms. Mar Drugs. 2010 8(4):1189–1202. doi:10.3390/md8041189.
(14) Tominaga K, Hongo N, Karato M, Yamashita E. Cosmetic benefits of astaxanthin on humans subjects.
Acta Biochim Pol. 2012 59(1):43–47. doi:10.18388/abp.2012_2168.
(15) Wijesinghe WAJP, Jeon YJ. Biological activities and potential cosmeceutical applications of bioactive
components from brown seaweeds: a review. Phytochem Rev. 2011 10(3):431–443.doi:10.1007/s11101-011-9214-4.
(16) Thomas NV, Kim SK. Beneficial effects of marine algal compounds in cosmeceuticals. Mar Drugs.
2013 11(1):146–164. doi:10.3390/md11010146.
(17) Guedes AC, Amaro HM, Malcata FX. Microalgae as sources of carotenoids. Mar Drugs. 2011 9(4):625–
644. doi:10.3390/md9040625.
(18) Ram S, Mitra M, Shah F, Tirkey SR, Mishra S. Bacteria as an alternate biofactory for carotenoid
production: a review of its applications, opportunities and challenges. J Funct Foods. 2020 67. doi:10.1016/j.
jff.2020.103867.
(19) Kusmita L, Mutiara EV, Nuryadi H, Pratama PA, Wiguna AS, Radjasa OK. Characterization of
carotenoid pigments from bacterial symbionts of soft-coral Sarcophyton sp. from north Java Sea. Int Aquat
Res. 2017 9(1):61–69. doi:10.1007/s40071-017-0157-2.
(20) Lilwani SR, Dokhale SM, Jr P, Vernekar MR. Isolation and characterization of a rare polar carotenoid
1′-OH-4-keto-ϒ-carotene from an indigenously isolated Rhodococcus kroppenstedtii MH715196. Food Sci
Appl Biotechnol. 2022 5(2):199–210. doi:10.30721/fsab2022.v5.i2.200.
Previous Page Next Page