194 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE Figure 1. Surface energy results of common surface treated pigments, solvents, encapsulated and non- encapsulated organic colorants, dry and moisturized cheek skin. 35 30 25 10 5 0 0 Figure 2. Surface energy results comparing P&G product, competitive product and moisturized cheek. 40 f 30 S 20 o 10 a. P&G product♦ Moisturized Skin • Competitive Product • 0 ---�-�-----� 0 10 20 30 Nonpolar (mJ/rrf) 40 Figure 3. Work of Adhesion of the P&G product and competitive product on moisturized cheek cg'140 §. 120 6 100 "ia 80 � 60 40 20 0 P&G Product Competitive product Product on Skin
Previous Page 
Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown)
From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)