66 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
hydrated solid format prototypes) were found to be shelf stable for a minimum of six
months shelf life.
With the positive results observed in both liquid formulation compatibility and stability
for OFS, we are currently working with established personal care and cleaning consumer
packaged goods companies to roll out our surfactants platform known as Eosix®.
OFS SURFACTANTS AS ENABLING TECHNOLOGY FOR SOLID FORMAT
FORMULATIONS
In contrast to ether sulfates, OFS surfactants can be produced as 100% active solids,
allowing the Eosix® surfactants platform to be incorporated into lightweight powder format
formulations. As evidenced by the growing number of companies developing powder refill
formulations of personal care and cleaning products, including Blueland®, Grove®, and
Kind Laundry®, consumers are increasingly drawn to the sustainability advantages of
eliminating single-use plastics. The personal care and cosmetics sector, projected to be
worth $463.5 billion by 2027, is a major source of plastic packaging, producing more
than 120 billion units of packaging per year globally, with the US generating 7.9 billion
units of rigid plastic in 2018 alone.31,32 This plastic waste is a significant detriment to
the world’s oceans and aquatic life, but these are not the only considerations for reducing
single-use plastics.33 Rising public health concerns regarding microplastics and a drive
to reduce shipping costs by decreasing water content across a wide variety of consumer
and industrial products also provide motivation for this transition to solid formulation
formats.34,35
As with any new product format, consumer adoption can be slow and growing pains are
inevitable. Among these, providing consumers with a readily available product of consistent
quality and a long shelf life are perhaps the most commonly cited. This can be particularly
challenging given that the consumers are the ones hydrating and mixing the formulation
as well as providing the pristine container to house the product, which often results in a
variable product experience. Spilling a small portion of the powder during preparation
or adding more water than directed can often result in sub-optimal product texture or
performance. Solid format refills of personal care products can often take 30–60 minutes to
fully dissolve and thicken to the appropriate consistency for use, depending on the order of
water addition and amount of agitation the consumers provide. Finally, a number of factors
including ingredient stability, solubility, as well as tolerance to cold and hard water can
result in inconsistencies in product texture, foaming, and appearance. The result can often
be a frustrating consumer experience not in line with the high expectations from their
favorite personal care brands.
OFS surfactants provide several advantages that ease the transition to solid format personal
care products. Exceptional tolerance to both cold and hard water provide a more consistent
experience regardless of the customer’s water source and product storage temperature, while
the high solubility assures a quick dissolve time allowing the product to be used shortly
after powder hydration. Sironix has developed powder body wash formulation prototypes
(Figure 6) featuring OFS, complete with texture enhancers, moisturizer, skin conditioning
agents, fragrance, pH regulation, and a preservative system. An exemplary formulation
composition for a powder body formulated with aloe vera and hydroxypropyl starch wash
refill is provided in Table II.
67 Oleo-Furan Sulfonates
In body wash prototype laboratory testing, powder formulations featuring OFS surfactants
were found to fully dissolve in less than 15 minutes, capable of providing a ready-to-
use gel with a consistency between 14,000–20,000 cps (depending on the selected
surfactant:cosurfactant:salt ratio) almost immediately after preparation. Powder loadings
reduced by 10–20% provided a similar gel consistency and lather richness, which may
allow for a consistent sensory experience regardless of error in overhydration or powder
loss during transfer to the product bottle. Both solid and liquid fragrances were found
to be compatible in powder OFS formulations, providing clear, homogenous solutions
however, co-formulation with anti-caking agents is recommended to improve flowability
when incorporating liquid fragrances. Silica, cellulose, and sodium bicarbonate were all
compatible anti-caking agents, with hydrated silica found to provide optimal powder flow.
Packaging tests for powder body wash formulations in heat-sealed sachets showed promise
Table II
Powder Body Wash Formulations Featuring OFS Surfactants
Ingredient Name Concentration in
Powder (wt%)
Concentration in
Hydrated Product (wt%)
Ingredient Function
Oleo-Furan Sulfonate 15–40 3–8 Cleansing
Cocoamidylpropyl Betaine 20–60 4–12 Cleansing, Texture
Sodium Chloride 5–15 1–3 Texture, Bulking
Hydrated Silica 5–10 1–2 Anti-Caking, Bulking
Fragrance 5–10 1–2 Fragrance
Aloe Vera 5–7 1–1.4 Moisturizer
Hydroxypropyl Starch 1–4 0.2–0.8 Texture
Citric Acid 1–2 0.2–0.4 pH Regulation
Potassium Sorbate 1–2 0.2–0.4 Preservative
Sodium Benzoate 0.5–1 0.1–0.2 Preservative
Water N/A 73–87
Figure 6. Example of a powder body wash formulation refill packet featuring Eosix® OFS surfactants to
reduce single-plastic use in personal care consumer products.
Previous Page Next Page