47 Sustainable Fragrances
In early 2024, there have been EU initiatives at the state level to introduce legislation to
limit PFAS that could enter into force before the proposal under REACH. In February
2025, LOI No. 2025-188 was passed into French Law, and will prohibit the manufacture,
import, export and placing on the market of any cosmetic product containing PFAS from
January 2026. The text does acknowledge a minimum concentration needs to be defined
for trace contamination below which the law would not apply.
Whilst PFAS are not intentionally used in the fragrance industry as ingredients one can
imagine that trace levels of PFAS could eventually be found in fragrance oil from, for
example, manufacturing steps where materials come into contact with Teflon O-rings or
other trace contamination. As legislators shift from “intentionally added” to restrictions at
ppb level in the EU, or in the US to PQL, the risks of being over a limit increases. Zero
doesn’t exist, and each year the threshold of detection lowers.
HUMAN ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
In some ways, this is one of the most difficult yet important issues for the industry.
Amongst the possible ethical considerations like cultural and gender diversity, religious
freedom, the two topics that have emerged as most sensitive are labour practices and fair or
living wage, often termed modern slavery. The subject is difficult because these aspects are
rarely if ever disclosed by suppliers and need to be identified by whistle blowers or on-site
audits. The point of focus of companies and civil society also evolves over time, influenced
by legislation, social media and political events.
Unacceptable labour practices can take the form of using child labour, migrant labour, prison
labour, or taking advantage of disadvantaged communities. Many companies refer to the
Dhaka Principles for Migrant Workers [43] as guidelines to be followed for the employment
of migrant workers, including the Employer Pays Principle related to fees for employment.
The subject of fair or living wage, now included in CSDDD, is a complex issue. The
Anker Institute [44] and the Global Living Wage Coalition [45] are considered amongst
the best methodology and data sources, especially for commodities and more urban areas,
however these cannot always be readily extrapolated to smaller volume naturals used by the
fragrance industry, often in rural areas. Other difficulties faced are access to primary data
and translation to seasonal, part-time work, often paid by volume not time. The Anker
methodology also needs to be adapted to be applicable for Europe. Another source of living
wage estimates is Wageindicator [46] and IDH, a Dutch NGO, has developed a process
to recognise robust living wage benchmark methodologies available in the market and
provides a tool to helps companies find credible living wage benchmarks [47].
A default position on wages adopted by many is to consider the minimum national wage,
where in general there is an official government figure [48, 49].
Many ethical issues are primarily country issues rather than specific crop issues so traceability
of natural raw materials or renewable feedstocks to at least the country of origin is essential
and transparency along the supply chain has improved significantly over recent years.
Publicly available information concerning labour risks, concerned countries or regions and
concerned goods is available from UNICEF [50], the Internation Labor Organisation (ILO)
[51] and the Bureau of International Labor Affairs of the US Department of Labor [52]. A
number of companies such as Sedex and Maplecroft provide commercial risk indices, often
48 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
at the level of countries and commodity crops. A more detailed commercially available
analysis including natural raw materials of relevance to the fragrance industry is available
from the Union for Ethical Biotrade (UEBT) [53].
The industry consensus is that in most cases where abuses are identified, the best way forward
is to work with the concerned supply chain to improve conditions, rather than to walk away,
and this is also the philosophy of CSDDD. Concerning cosmetic ingredients, the Responsible
Mica Initiative is a good example [54] where external assessment has confirmed progress.
There are a limited number of consortia working to improve identified issues on specific
fragrance ingredient supply chains, such as the Sustainable Vanilla Initiative hosted by the
Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH) and the Harvesting the Future Project coordinated by the
Fair Labor Association. Some natural materials can be purchased with ethical certification
like UEBT-certified, Fair-for-Life certified, FairWild certified and, Flocert (Fairtrade).
The acronyms Human Rights Due Diligence and HREDD (Human Rights and
Environmental Due Diligence) are increasingly common, and AIM-progress has recently
provided open-sourced guidance for companies to perform HREDD assessments [55].
In terms of specific legislation, in the USA the California Transparency in Supply Chains
Act of 2010 (S.B. 657, § 2) requires companies to disclose the steps they are taking to
eradicate slavery, human trafficking, or forced labour from their supply chains, both within
the company or their supply chain. Today this takes the form of a signed declaration
confirming compliance.
For Europe, as mentioned above, CSDDD or CS3D, (EU) 2024/1760 was approved in 2024
and concerns companies with more than 1,000 employees and a worldwide turnover of
more than €450 million. It can be seen as an extension of the 2023 German Supply Chain
Supply Obligations Act (LkSG) both in geographic scope and extent, especially concerning
indirect suppliers [56]. CSDDD covers human and environmental due diligence, alongside
aspects of climate change, deforestation, and biodiversity discussed above. Many of the
prohibitions and obligations included in the Environmental Instruments (Annex, Part II)
are not relevant to the fragrance industry. The same cannot be said for the Rights and
Prohibitions included in International Human Rights Instruments (Annex, Part I).
Concerned companies have to implement a risk-based system to monitor, prevent, or
remedy human rights and environmental damage linked to direct and indirect suppliers,
following a six-step approach to corporate responsibility, based on the due diligence process
described in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct [57].
CSDDD covers a broad range of human rights, drawing on a number of existing Covenants
and Conventions included are: right to life, prohibition of torture, right to liberty and
security, freedom of thought and religious practice, fair and living wage, adequate housing,
food, clothes, water and sanitation, children’s rights, prohibition of child labour, prohibition
of forced or compulsory labour, freedom of association, equal employment, environmental
degradation (discussed above), and land rights.
If a violation of human rights or environmental obligations is identified, companies have
to take appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate, and bring to an end or minimise the
adverse impacts arising from their activities. Companies can be held liable for damage
caused and potentially provide compensation for the affected parties.
Annual reporting is required and for most concerned companies this will be via their
CSRD report.
Previous Page Next Page