2008 TRI/PRINCETON CONFERENCE 249 tration (0.1%) and low polymer concentration (0.1%), the experimental polymer performs well vs. the benchmark. As would be expected, the concentration of silicone deposited on the hair is less than at 1% silicone (534 mg/kg at 0.1% silicone and 5400 mg/kg at 1% silicone) and similar to that deposited from the formulation containing cationic guar (523 mg/kg at 1% silicone). This wide range of silicone and polymer concentrations available to the formulator increases fl exibility in formulation design. The data presented indicate the experimental polymer can be used in 2-in-1 formula- tions to deposit silicone and improve hair conditioning performance. Not all shampoos, however, contain silicone. Therefore, the polymer was evaluated against cationic guar, PQ10 and PQ7 in shampoos without silicone. As mentioned earlier, the experimental polymer is not able to form clear shampoos. Of the four polymers tested (15.5% SLES- 2/2.6% DSCADA), only PQ10 formed clear formulations. In each case , the experimen- tal polymer performed as well or better than the commercial polymers in panel studies. The data for comparison vs. PQ7 is shown in Figure 9. This data shows the largest im- provement in wet comb properties with 100% of the panelists preferring the experi- mental polymer over PQ7. The comparison to PQ10, on the other hand, showed parity (data not shown). CONCLUSIONS Synthetic cationic polymers were evaluated for conditioning performance in shampoos. The commercial polymer, PQ7, showed some conditioning performance and silicone de- position compared to benchmark PQ10 and cationic guar polymers. Additional modifi ca- tions to PQ7 had only minor affects on performance. A new, experimental cationic polymer designed for a different industry was found to improve silicone deposition up to ten fold at signifi cantly lower polymer concentrations than typically used in shampoo formulations. In addition, these polymers performed well in panel studies vs. benchmark polymers, even at 1/10 the silicone concentration. The improved effi ciency of deposition gives formulators formulation fl exibility and could reduce overall formulation cost. Figure 9. Panel study comparing experimental polymer with PQ7 in 15.5% SLES-2/2.6% DSCADA base. Wet and dry comb and feel was evaluated. Black: 0.25% PQ7 gray: 0.1% experimental polymer.

JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE 250 REFERENCES (1) W. Li and S. L. P. Jordan, Cationic cellulosic polymers with multifunctional and outstanding perfor- mance for personal care, Cosmet. Toiletr., 1, 1–4 (2003). (2) R. Schueller and P. Romanowski, “Introduction to Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin”, in Condi- tioning Agents for Hair and Skin, R. Schueller and P. Romanowski, Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 1–12. (3) B. Idson, “Polymers as Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin,” in Conditioning Agents for Hair and Skin, R. Schueller and P. Romanowski, Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 251–280. (4) S. L. Jordan, R. L. Kreeger, X. Zhang, T. V. Drovetskaya, C. B. Davis, J. L. Amos, S. E. Gabelnick, S. Zhou, W. Li, E. F. DiAntonio, and A. A. Protonentis, “Effect of Hydrophobic Substitution on Cationic Conditioning Polymers,” in Cosmetic Nanotechnology Polymers and Colloids in Cosmetics, S. E. Morgan, K. O. Havelka, and R. Y. Lochhead, Eds. (ACS Symposium Series, 2007), pp. 59–71. (5) R. Y. Lochhead, “Shampoos,” in The Chemistry and Manufacture of Cosmetics, 3rd ed., M. L. Schlossman, Ed. (Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, IL, 2002), vol. 2, pp. 277–326. (6) R. Y. Lochhead, Conditioning shampoo, Soap, Cosmet. Chem. Spec., 42–49 (October 1992). (7) E. D. Goddard, “Polymer/Surfactant Interaction in Applied Systems,” in Principles of Polymer Science and Technology in Cosmetics and Personal Care, E. D. Goddard and J. V. Grubber, Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 181. (8) T. V. Drovetskaya, R. L. Kreeger, J. L. Amos, C. B. Davis, and S. Zhou, Effects of low-level hydrophobic substitution on conditioning properties of cationic cellulosic polymers in shampoo systems, J. Cosmet. Sci., 55(Suppl.), S195–S205 (2004). (9) T. V. Drovetskaya, E. F. DiAntonio, R. L. Kreeger, J. L. Amos, and D. P. Frank, New high-charge den- sity hydrophobically modifi ed cationic HEC polymers for improved co-deposition of benefi t agents and serious conditioning for problem hair, J. Cosmet. Sci., 58, 421–434 (2007). (10) R. Y. Lochhead and J. V. Gruber, “Appendix: Encyclopedia of Polymers and Thickeners for Cosmetics,” in Principles of Polymer Science and Technology in Cosmetics and Personal Care, E. D. Goddard and J. V. Grub- ber, Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 571–655. (11) J. V. Gruber, “Synthetic Polymers in Cosmetics,” in Principles of Polymer Science and Technology in Cosmetics and Personal Care, E. D. Goddard and J. V. Grubber, Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), pp. 217– 274. (12) W. Li, J. Amos, S. Jordan, A. Theis, and C. Davis, Selecting the optimum silicone particle size/cationic polymer structure to maximize shampoo conditioning performance, J. Cosmet. Sci., 57(2), 178–180 (2006).