592 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
Different active ingredients were tested to investigate their effect on the growth of these
species to evaluate if any would have an impact on the microbial profile. On one hand, one
of them had for example an appreciable impact on the bacterial growth of species isolated
from NS (Figure 6A, Inonotus obliquus). However, as we observed large variations for several
species of Staphylococcus and Cornybacterium, these results would need to be confirmed. On
the other hand, some ingredients had a slight influence on the growth of species (Figure 6B,
Dendrobium officinale). This type of ingredient may fit into the “microbiome-friendly” trend,
meaning an ingredient that would cause little or no damage to the NS flora, to preserve its
protective function of the skin.
Finally, the impact of C. acnes, the most abundant bacteria found in both cohorts showing
an increase in SS was evaluated for its impact on keratinocytes. We first assessed how a
series of dilutions from 106–108 CFU/mL of living C. acnes strains derived from either
NS or SS source and placed in an insert affected the survival of keratinocytes grown
underneath. (Figure 7, left). The threshold of viability was fixed at 80% of cells viability.
The results showed no strong decrease in cell viability until 107 CFU/mL regardless of
the living C. acnes source. However, at 108 CFU/mL, all C. acnes from SS induced through
soluble factors a decrease of keratinocytes viability below the 80% threshold, with a higher
impact for SS4 and SS8 species. Then, we evaluated the production of IL-8 chemokine
by keratinocytes grown in contact with heat-killed C. acnes seeded at 106–108 CFU/mL
(Figure 7, right). IL-8 is a potent chemotactic and proinflammatory cytokine, produced
in the skin by a variety of cells in response to inflammatory stimuli, especially in SS. We
observed that at the highest dose of 108 CFU/mL, heat-killed C. acnes SS4 and SS7 are
more stressful than the C. acnes from NS or SS8 as they strongly induced IL-8 release by
keratinocytes grown in contact.
Figure 6. Illustration of growth results of 2 ingredients on the bacterial collection from normal skin. Growth
of 31 selected bacterial species evaluated with increasing concentrations of active ingredients over 24 h, 48 h,
and 72 h. A: Example of Inonotus obliquus mushroom extract at C1 to C4 (0.01%–1%), with impact on bacterial
growth. B: Example of Dendrobium officinale stem extract at C1 to C4 (0.002%–0.05%) showing minimal
changes in microbial growth. Boxes in green resulted in no significant growth difference compared to
untreated control, boxes in light gray showed growth inhibition and in dark gray growth increase. Statistics:
n =4, Dunnett’s multiple comparison test versus untreated control, significant when p 0.05.
593 Specificities of Microbiota From Sensitive Skin
DISCUSSION
Sensitive skin, or reactive skin, is defined by the self-reported presence of different sensory
perceptions, including tightness, tingling and pain in response to stimuli that typically
does not provoke such sensations.19 SS condition may occur in individuals with skin barrier
disturbance, for instance. The aim of our study was to compare the compositions of and,
in parallel, to isolate in culture the skin microbiota of individuals with NS and SS to
better understand this skin condition as well as use the isolated bacterial species to create
a collection then a community of representative species to test against cosmetic active
ingredients.
In congruence with the existing literature,14-16 we confirmed that there are no significant
differences of microbial diversity between the two cohorts using Shannon index after 16S
RNA sequencing contrary to Lu et al.,17 who observed on a small cohort a limited decrease in
diversity using Faith’s Phylogenetic diversity index after 2bRAD-M sequencing. Therefore,
it was necessary to further analyze the balance of the microbiota between SS and NS at the
Figure 7. Effect of different strains of C. acnes from NS or SS on the viability of the keratinocytes (left) and
IL-8 release (right). The inflammatory cocktail control consisted of 12.5 ng/ml of TNFα, 12.5 ng/mL of IFNγ
and 0.5 µg/mL of Poly I:C. Statistics: n =3, Student t-test or Anova versus Untreated, *p 0.05, ***p
0.001, NS: not significant.
Previous Page Next Page