The Vicious Cycle of Biopsychosocial Desperation for Sensitive Skin Sufferers

376 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
(39) Falcone D, Richters RJH, Uzunbajakava NE, Van Erp PEJ, Van De Kerkhof PCM. Sensitive skin, and
the influence of female hormone fluctuations: results from a cross-sectional digital survey in the Dutch
population. Eur J Dermatol. 2017 27(1):42-48. doi:10.1684/ejd.2016.2913
(40) Barankin B, DeKoven J. Psychosocial effect of common skin diseases. Can Fam Physician. 2002 48:712-716.
(41) Hong J, Koo B, Koo J. The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease. Dermatol Ther.
2008 21(1):54-59. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00170.x
(42) Yew YW, Kuan AHY, Ge L, Yap CW, Heng BH. Psychosocial impact of skin diseases: A population-
based study. PLOS ONE. 2020 15(12):e0244765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244765
(43) Dalgard FJ, Gieler U, Tomas-Aragones L, et al. The psychological burden of skin diseases: A cross-
sectional multicenter study among dermatological out-patients in 13 European countries. J Invest
Dermatol. 2015 135(4):984-991. doi:10.1038/jid.2014.530
(44) Costeris C, Petridou M, Ioannou Y. Psychological impact of skin disorders on patients’ self-esteem, and
perceived social support. J Dermatol Ski Sci. 2021 3:14-22.
(45) Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, et al. Sensitive skin: psychological effects and seasonal changes. J Eur Acad
Dermatol Venereol. 2007 21(5):620-628. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02027.x
(46) Polena H, Chavagnac-Bonneville M, Misery L, Sayag M. Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) questionnaire
and current perception threshold: use as diagnostic tools for sensitive skin syndrome. Acta Derm Venereol.
2021 101(11):adv00606. doi:10.2340/actadv.v101.365
(47) Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with
environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis. 2008 59(4):226-232. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01398.x
(48) Misery L, Morisset S, Séité S, et al. Relationship between sensitive skin and sleep disorders, fatigue, dust,
sweating, food, tobacco consumption or female hormonal changes: results from a worldwide survey of 10
743 individuals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 35(6):1371-1376. doi:10.1111/jdv.17162
(49) Farage MA. How do perceptions of sensitive skin differ at different anatomical sites? An epidemiological
study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 34(8):e521-e530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03487.x
(50) Farage MA, Nusair TL, Hanseman D, Sherman SN, Tsevat J. The Farage quality of life measure for
consumer products: development and initial implementation. Appl Res Qual Life. 2010 5(1):1-25.
doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9087-5
(51) Farage MA, Rodenberg C, Chen J. Translation and validation of the Farage quality of life (FQoL)
instrument for consumer products into traditional Chinese. Glob J Health Sci. 2012 5(1):1-12. doi:10.5539/
gjhs.v5n1p1
(52) Zhang L, Adique A, Sarkar P, et al. The impact of routine skin care on the quality of life. Cosmetics.
2020 7(3):59. doi:10.3390/cosmetics7030059
(53) Verhoeven EW, Kraaimaat FW, van de Kerkhof PC, et al. Prevalence of physical symptoms of itch, pain,
and fatigue in patients with skin diseases in general practice. Br J Dermatol. 2007 156(6):1346-1349.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07916.x
(54) Misery L, Shourick J, Taïeb C. Prevalence and characterization of fatigue in patients with skin diseases.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 100(18):adv00327. doi:10.2340/00015555-3694
(55) Mostaghimi L, Hetzel S. Insomnia, and other sleep complaints in inflammatory versus noninflammatory
skin disorders: an observational case-control study. Int J Dermatol. 2019 58(8):976-981. doi:10.1111/
ijd.14488
(56) Schmelz M. Itch processing in the skin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 6:167. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00167
(57) Halioua B, Misery L, Seite S, et al. Influence of skin subjective symptoms on sleep quality in patients
with cutaneous disorders: A study of 2871 subjects. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 14:143-152.
doi:10.2147/CCID.S288557
(58) Osman OT, Mufaddel A, Almugaddam F, Augusterfer EF. The psychiatric aspects of skin disorders.
Expert Rev Dermatol. 2011 6(2):195-209. doi:10.1586/edm.11.10
(59) Verhoeven EWM, de Klerk S, Kraaimaat FW, van de Kerkhof PCM, de Jong EMGJ, Evers AWM.
Biopsychosocial mechanisms of chronic itch in patients with skin diseases: a review. Acta Derm Venereol.
2008 88(3):211-218. doi:10.2340/00015555-0452

377 Sensitive Skin Syndrome
(60) Huynh TT. Burden of disease: the psychosocial impact of rosacea on a Patient’s quality of life. Am Health
Drug Benefits. 2013 6(6):348-354.
(61) Reich A, Wójcik-Maciejewicz A, Slominski AT. Stress and the skin. G Ital Dermatol Venereol.
2010 145(2):213-219.
(62) Blount BW, Pelletier AL. Rosacea: A common, yet commonly overlooked, condition. Am Fam Physician.
2002 66(3):435-440.
(63) Saint-Martory C, Roguedas-Contios AM, Sibaud V, Degouy A, Schmitt AM, Misery L. Sensitive skin is
not limited to the face. Br J Dermatol. 2008 158(1):130-133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08280.x
(64) Misery L, Jean-Decoster C, Mery S, Georgescu V, Sibaud V. A new ten-item questionnaire for assessing
sensitive skin: the Sensitive Scale-10. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014 94(6):635-639. doi:10.2340/00015555-1870
(65) Kluger N, Le Floc’h C, Niore M, Delvigne V, Le Dantec G, Taieb C. Self-Reported Skin Sensation by
People Who Have Experienced Containment During COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol.
2020 13:943-947. doi:10.2147/CCID.S280310
(66) Farage MA, Simms L, Acuff A, Geneus C. An integrative view of sensitive skin syndrome. 25th World
Congress of Dermatology-Singapore July 2023.

Previous Page Next Page

Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown)
From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources

Download PDF The Vicious Cycle of Biopsychosocial Desperation for Sensitive Skin Sufferers (16)

Extracted Text (may have errors)

376 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
(39) Falcone D, Richters RJH, Uzunbajakava NE, Van Erp PEJ, Van De Kerkhof PCM. Sensitive skin, and
the influence of female hormone fluctuations: results from a cross-sectional digital survey in the Dutch
population. Eur J Dermatol. 2017 27(1):42-48. doi:10.1684/ejd.2016.2913
(40) Barankin B, DeKoven J. Psychosocial effect of common skin diseases. Can Fam Physician. 2002 48:712-716.
(41) Hong J, Koo B, Koo J. The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease. Dermatol Ther.
2008 21(1):54-59. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00170.x
(42) Yew YW, Kuan AHY, Ge L, Yap CW, Heng BH. Psychosocial impact of skin diseases: A population-
based study. PLOS ONE. 2020 15(12):e0244765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244765
(43) Dalgard FJ, Gieler U, Tomas-Aragones L, et al. The psychological burden of skin diseases: A cross-
sectional multicenter study among dermatological out-patients in 13 European countries. J Invest
Dermatol. 2015 135(4):984-991. doi:10.1038/jid.2014.530
(44) Costeris C, Petridou M, Ioannou Y. Psychological impact of skin disorders on patients’ self-esteem, and
perceived social support. J Dermatol Ski Sci. 2021 3:14-22.
(45) Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, et al. Sensitive skin: psychological effects and seasonal changes. J Eur Acad
Dermatol Venereol. 2007 21(5):620-628. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02027.x
(46) Polena H, Chavagnac-Bonneville M, Misery L, Sayag M. Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) questionnaire
and current perception threshold: use as diagnostic tools for sensitive skin syndrome. Acta Derm Venereol.
2021 101(11):adv00606. doi:10.2340/actadv.v101.365
(47) Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with
environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis. 2008 59(4):226-232. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01398.x
(48) Misery L, Morisset S, Séité S, et al. Relationship between sensitive skin and sleep disorders, fatigue, dust,
sweating, food, tobacco consumption or female hormonal changes: results from a worldwide survey of 10
743 individuals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 35(6):1371-1376. doi:10.1111/jdv.17162
(49) Farage MA. How do perceptions of sensitive skin differ at different anatomical sites? An epidemiological
study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 34(8):e521-e530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03487.x
(50) Farage MA, Nusair TL, Hanseman D, Sherman SN, Tsevat J. The Farage quality of life measure for
consumer products: development and initial implementation. Appl Res Qual Life. 2010 5(1):1-25.
doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9087-5
(51) Farage MA, Rodenberg C, Chen J. Translation and validation of the Farage quality of life (FQoL)
instrument for consumer products into traditional Chinese. Glob J Health Sci. 2012 5(1):1-12. doi:10.5539/
gjhs.v5n1p1
(52) Zhang L, Adique A, Sarkar P, et al. The impact of routine skin care on the quality of life. Cosmetics.
2020 7(3):59. doi:10.3390/cosmetics7030059
(53) Verhoeven EW, Kraaimaat FW, van de Kerkhof PC, et al. Prevalence of physical symptoms of itch, pain,
and fatigue in patients with skin diseases in general practice. Br J Dermatol. 2007 156(6):1346-1349.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07916.x
(54) Misery L, Shourick J, Taïeb C. Prevalence and characterization of fatigue in patients with skin diseases.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 100(18):adv00327. doi:10.2340/00015555-3694
(55) Mostaghimi L, Hetzel S. Insomnia, and other sleep complaints in inflammatory versus noninflammatory
skin disorders: an observational case-control study. Int J Dermatol. 2019 58(8):976-981. doi:10.1111/
ijd.14488
(56) Schmelz M. Itch processing in the skin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 6:167. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00167
(57) Halioua B, Misery L, Seite S, et al. Influence of skin subjective symptoms on sleep quality in patients
with cutaneous disorders: A study of 2871 subjects. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 14:143-152.
doi:10.2147/CCID.S288557
(58) Osman OT, Mufaddel A, Almugaddam F, Augusterfer EF. The psychiatric aspects of skin disorders.
Expert Rev Dermatol. 2011 6(2):195-209. doi:10.1586/edm.11.10
(59) Verhoeven EWM, de Klerk S, Kraaimaat FW, van de Kerkhof PCM, de Jong EMGJ, Evers AWM.
Biopsychosocial mechanisms of chronic itch in patients with skin diseases: a review. Acta Derm Venereol.
2008 88(3):211-218. doi:10.2340/00015555-0452

377 Sensitive Skin Syndrome
(60) Huynh TT. Burden of disease: the psychosocial impact of rosacea on a Patient’s quality of life. Am Health
Drug Benefits. 2013 6(6):348-354.
(61) Reich A, Wójcik-Maciejewicz A, Slominski AT. Stress and the skin. G Ital Dermatol Venereol.
2010 145(2):213-219.
(62) Blount BW, Pelletier AL. Rosacea: A common, yet commonly overlooked, condition. Am Fam Physician.
2002 66(3):435-440.
(63) Saint-Martory C, Roguedas-Contios AM, Sibaud V, Degouy A, Schmitt AM, Misery L. Sensitive skin is
not limited to the face. Br J Dermatol. 2008 158(1):130-133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08280.x
(64) Misery L, Jean-Decoster C, Mery S, Georgescu V, Sibaud V. A new ten-item questionnaire for assessing
sensitive skin: the Sensitive Scale-10. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014 94(6):635-639. doi:10.2340/00015555-1870
(65) Kluger N, Le Floc’h C, Niore M, Delvigne V, Le Dantec G, Taieb C. Self-Reported Skin Sensation by
People Who Have Experienced Containment During COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol.
2020 13:943-947. doi:10.2147/CCID.S280310
(66) Farage MA, Simms L, Acuff A, Geneus C. An integrative view of sensitive skin syndrome. 25th World
Congress of Dermatology-Singapore July 2023.

Help

378
J. Cosmet. Sci., 75.5, 378–407 (September/October 2024)
*Address all correspondence to K. P. Anathapadmanabhan, ananthky@ucmail.uc.edu.
Interactions of Cosmetic Ingredients With Human Stratum
Corneum
K. P. ANANTHAPADMANABHAN
James L Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Accepted for publication December 02, 2024.
Synopsis
The human stratum corneum (SC) is a physical barrier that prevents excessive water loss from the body and
prevents the penetration of external pollutants and chemicals into the body. It is also a microbial barrier that
prevents germs and microbes from entering the body. Skincare is all about protecting the SC barrier and
ensuring its water holding and viscoelastic properties. The SC is routinely exposed to a wide range of chemicals
including cleansing agents, moisturizers, and other advanced skincare products. Ingredients and products can
interact with the SC barrier—some leading to weakening the barrier, and others to strengthening it. In this
article, interactions of commonly used chemical ingredients with SC and their impact on SC barrier properties
are reviewed, and approaches to identifying barrier-friendly ingredients are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
The stratum corneum (SC) is the main barrier that prevents water loss from the body and
prevents the penetration of chemicals, pollutants, and germs into the body. Maintaining a
healthy SC is important not only for visibly good-looking skin, but also for ensuring overall
health and hygiene. The SC, however, is vulnerable to damage from changes in environmental
conditions, such as temperature and humidity, and from the chemicals and pollutants in the
atmosphere. Some chemicals, such as surfactants in cosmetic and personal care products,
can also lead to alterations in the properties of the SC, resulting in a weakening of the
barrier. A combination of factors—for example, a harsh cleanser with low temperature and/
or low humidity—can exacerbate the SC condition, resulting in a poor SC barrier. The
consequence of a poor skin barrier is the penetration of irritants into deeper layers, resulting
in a biochemical response from the body that often manifests as dry, itchy, and inflamed skin.
Ingredients found in moisturizers such as occlusives, humectants, and lipids can enhance
barrier properties. Selection of cosmetic ingredients based on an understanding of their
interactions with the SC barrier will help minimize and will even eliminate the harmful
effects of cosmetic ingredients on skin. In this review, the impact of some of the common
classes of chemicals used in cosmetic and personal care products and the ways to minimize
their damaging effect while maximizing their beneficial effects on the SC are discussed.

379 The Human Stratum Corneum
BACKGROUND
The human SC, the uppermost layer of the skin, consists of about 70% proteins, 15% lipids,
and 15% water. The simplistic view of SC as a “brick and mortar” structure consisting of
corneocyte “bricks” embedded in a continuous lipid matrix made of ceramides, cholesterol,
and fatty acids has been refined over the past three decades, due to more information
on the composition and organization of lipids and proteins in the SC.1–5 The SC, which
was thought to be a dead tissue in the 70s, is now considered to be a hot bed of enzyme
activity.3 The role of the skin microbiome in maintaining a healthy barrier is also receiving
increased attention over the past decade.6–8 Recent advances in our spectroscopic and
imaging techniques including in-vivo techniques9–13 have made it possible to characterize
the structure and function of healthy SC, and in turn help us to understand the changes in
them upon exposure to weather conditions, cosmetic products (such as skin cleansing and
skin care products), and environmental pollutants.
Regular use of cosmetics and personal care products has become part of daily routine in the
modern era. Practices that started off as enhancing daily hygiene and beauty have evolved
into care and protection of skin, scalp, hair, and oral surfaces. Preventive care from harmful
effects arising from UV radiation and environmental pollutants have added another
dimension to the care aspects of personal care products. Furthermore, with the anticipated
increase in the aging population that is expected to exceed over a billion people of 65+
years age, and with skin as a major conduit for infections for this population, protecting
the skin barrier with personal care products for the elderly has become an important part
of the wellness regime. Thus, cosmetic and personal care products have become part of the
wellness-healthcare continuum to ensure an improved quality of life and healthcare for all.
All these trends have increased the exposure of a wide variety of products and associated
chemicals daily, and therefore the safety and efficacy of cosmetic and personal care products
have become even more important than ever before.
While there is an increased use of personal care and cosmetics products for reasons discussed
above, there is also an increased awareness among consumers through social media about
various ingredients that are being used in daily use products. This trend is driving use of
more “naturals” and sustainable ingredients into the product line. The trend also extends to
“free-of” technologies such as sulfate-free, preservative-free, and fragrance-free products. These
changes offer interesting challenges and opportunities for formulators requiring increased
scrutiny of the alternatives for ensuring product efficacy, consumer desired sensory, and safety.
In this changing environment, it is important that the choice of ingredients for cosmetic and
personal care products are made based on a scientific understanding of their safety, efficacy,
and their effects on the SC barrier. In this review, interaction of common classes of ingredients
encountered in personal care products is reviewed and general guidelines for selection of
ingredients that will have minimal impact on the SC barrier are discussed. Specifically, the
discussion here will include surfactants, emulsifiers, emollients, occlusives, humectants, skin
benefit lipids, and penetration enhancers. In areas where recent reviews are available, the
discussion will be limited to general guidelines with appropriate literature references.
THE STRUCTURE OF HUMAN STRATUM CORNEUM
The SC, the uppermost layer of human skin, is the main barrier that prevents excessive
water loss from the body and prevents the penetration of chemicals, pollutants, and germs

Previous Page Next Page

Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown)
From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources

Download PDF Interactions of Cosmetic Ingredients with Human Stratum Corneum (30)

374 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
leisure, recreation, fitness, self-confidence, personal pleasure, and vitality. Questionnaire-
based QoL type instruments have demonstrated that subjects with sensitive skin score worse
in satisfaction with appearance, daily life, and sense of well-being. Subjects with SSS had
significantly worse scores for sleep disorders compared to subjects without sensitive skin.
Becoming aware of both the vicious cycle of biopsychosocial impacts and how it can impact
individuals with SSS can help both the practitioner and consumer to understand, manage,
and develop more appropriate approaches and programs (i.e., treatments, therapies, and so
forth) to drive a more holistic and sustainable QoL impact for SSS consumers. We reiterate
the call to consider SSS as an integrative multiphenomena condition to not only drive more
holistic understanding of the syndrome, but also continue to pursue solutions (i.e., skin
ingredients/products) that would inclusively and collectively impact skin/body/mind state
of SSS sufferers.66
REFERENCES
(1) Farage MA. Understanding the sensitive skin subject to achieve a more holistic diagnosis. Cosmetics.
2021 8(3):81. doi:10.3390/cosmetics8030081
(2) Bataille A, Le Gall-Ianotto CL, Genin E, Misery L. Sensitive skin: lessons from transcriptomic studies.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 6:115. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00115
(3) Misery L, Ständer S, Szepietowski JC, et al. Definition of sensitive skin: an expert position paper from
the special interest group on sensitive skin of the international forum for the study of itch. Acta Derm
Venereol. 2017 97(1):4-6. doi:10.2340/00015555-2397
(4) Berardesca E, Farage M, Maibach H. Sensitive skin: an overview. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2013 35(1):2-8.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00754.x
(5) Farage MA. The prevalence of sensitive skin. Front Med (Lausanne).2019 6:98.doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00098
(6) Chen W, Dai R, Li L. The prevalence of self-declared sensitive skin: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 34(8):1779-1788. doi:10.1111/jdv.16166
(7) Misery L, Jourdan E, Abadie S, et al. Development and validation of a new tool to assess the Burden of
Sensitive Skin (BoSS). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 32(12):2217-2223. doi:10.1111/jdv.15186
(8) Cho HJ, Chung BY, Lee HB, Kim HO, Park CW, Lee CH. Quantitative study of stratum corneum
ceramides contents in patients with sensitive skin. J Dermatol. 2012 39(3):295-300. doi:10.1111/
j.1346-8138.2011.01406.x
(9) Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and
regional variability. Br J Dermatol. 1990 123(5):607-613. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1990.tb01477.x
(10) Pons-Guiraud A. Sensitive skin: A complex and multifactorial syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol.
2004 3(3):145-148. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2130.2004.00082.x
(11) Misery L, Weisshaar E, Brenaut E, et al. Pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin: position
paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch
(IFSI). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 34(2):222-229. doi:10.1111/jdv.16000
(12) Roussaki-Schulze AV, Zafiriou E, Nikoulis D, Klimi E, Rallis E, Zintzaras E. Objective biophysical
findings in patients with sensitive skin. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2005 31(suppl):17-24.
(13) Misery L, Loser K, Ständer S. Sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 30(suppl 1):2-8.
doi:10.1111/jdv.13532
(14) Buhé V, Vié K, Guéré C, et al. Pathophysiological study of sensitive skin. Acta Derm Venereol.
2016 96(3):314-318. doi:10.2340/00015555-2235
(15) Ehnis-Pérez A, Torres-Álvarez B, Cortés-García D, Hernández-Blanco D, Fuentes-Ahumada C,
Castanedo-Cázares JP. Relationship between transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 expression and the
intensity of sensitive skin symptoms. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 15(3):231-237. doi:10.1111/jocd.12204

375 Sensitive Skin Syndrome
(16) Kueper T, Krohn M, Haustedt LO, Hatt H, Schmaus G, Vielhaber G. Inhibition of TRPV1 for the
treatment of sensitive skin. Exp Dermatol. 2010 19(11):980-986. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01122.x
(17) Mikkelsen CS, Holmgren HR, Kjellman P, et al. Rosacea: A clinical review. Dermatol Reports.
2016 8(1):6387. doi:10.4081/dr.2016.6387
(18) Chang ALS, Raber I, Xu J, et al. Assessment of the genetic basis of rosacea by genome-wide association
study. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 135(6):1548-1555. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.53
(19) Kim YR, Cheon HI, Misery L, Taieb C, Lee YW. Sensitive skin in Korean population: an epidemiological
approach. Skin Res Technol. 2018 24(2):229-234. doi:10.1111/srt.12418
(20) Brenaut E, Misery L, Taieb C. Sensitive skin in the Indian population: an epidemiological approach.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 6:29. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00029
(21) Wang X-Y, Liu Y-Y, Liu Y-X, et al. A predictive model for differential diagnosis between rosacea and
sensitive skin: A cross-sectional study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 133(17):2132-2134. doi:10.1097/CM9.000
0000000001001
(22) Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharrière O, et al. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol.
2001 145(2):258-263. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04343.x
(23) Misery L, Jourdan E, Huet F, et al. Sensitive skin in France: A study on prevalence, relationship with age
and skin type and impact on quality of life. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 32(5):791-795. doi:10.1111/
jdv.14837
(24) Farage MA, Bowtell P, Katsarou A. Self-diagnosed sensitive skin in women with clinically diagnosed
atopic dermatitis. Clin Med Dermatol. 2008 2:21-28.
(25) Farage MA, Jiang Y, Tiesman JP, Fontanillas P, Osborne R. Genome-wide association study identifies
loci associated with sensitive skin. Cosmetics. 2020 7(2):49. doi:10.3390/cosmetics7020049
(26) Misery L, Cochener B, Brenaut E, Séité S, Taieb C. Association of sensitive skin with sensitive corneas
and sensitive eyelids. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 33(7):1358-1362. doi:10.1111/jdv.15595
(27) Misery L, Duboc H, Coffin B, Brenaut E, Huet F, Taieb C. Association between two painful and poorly
understood conditions: irritable bowel and sensitive skin syndromes. Eur J Pain. 2019 23(1):160-166.
doi:10.1002/ejp.1296
(28) Huet F, Misery L. Sensitive skin is a neuropathic disorder. Exp Dermatol. 2019 28(12):1470-1473. doi:10.1111/
exd.13991
(29) Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin with age. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI, eds. Textbook
of Aging Skin. 2nd ed. Springer 2017.
(30) Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and
repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis.2002 46(2):86-93.doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460205.x
(31) Lejman E, Stoudemayer T, Grove G, Kligman AM. Age differences in poison ivy dermatitis. Contact
Dermatitis. 1984 11(3):163-167. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00964.x
(32) Grove GL, Duncan S, Kligman AM. Effect of ageing on the blistering of human skin with ammonium
hydroxide. Br J Dermatol. 1982 107(4):393-400. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb00382.x
(33) Misery L, Sibaud V, Merial-Kieny C, Taieb C. Sensitive skin in the American population: prevalence, clinical
data, and role of the dermatologist. Int J Dermatol. 2011 50(8):961-967. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.04884.x
(34) Xiao X, Qiao L, Ye R, Zuo F. Nationwide survey and identification of potential stress factor in sensitive
skin of Chinese women. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 13:867-874. doi:10.2147/CCID.S284359
(35) Farage MA. Does sensitive skin differ between men and women? Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010 29(3):153-163.
doi:10.3109/15569521003774990
(36) Farage MA, Mandl CP, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sensitive skin in China. J Cosmet Dermatol Sci Appl.
2012 02(3):184-195. doi:10.4236/jcdsa.2012.23035
(37) Farage MA. Sensitive skin in the genital area. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 6:96. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019
00096
(38) Farage MA, Neill S, MacLean AB. Physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle: a review.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009 64(1):58-72. doi:10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181932a37

Previous Page Next Page

Purchased for the exclusive use of nofirst nolast (unknown)
From: SCC Media Library & Resource Center (library.scconline.org)

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources

Download PDF The Vicious Cycle of Biopsychosocial Desperation for Sensitive Skin Sufferers (16)

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources

All section downloads (PDF) click to expand contents

Extracted Text (may have errors)

Help

loading

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources

Volume 75 No 5 - Sustainability Special Issue - Open Access resources