496 JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE
Formulas with a high pH (e.g., pH 9) may be achieved by the addition of sodium
thioglycolate, as is done for permanent wave products and hair relaxers. Alkaline agents
such as NaOH or triethanolamine may be used to increase the pH to pH 9, and this
makes it more difficult for bacteria to survive because they need to expend energy to
maintain their intracellular pH/homeostasis. For example, liquid soaps with an alkaline
pH (pH 9.5–10.5) present a hostile environment for growth of microorganisms due to the
chaotropic (i.e., membrane destabilizing) effect of ionized fatty acids and the free alkalinity
due to NaOH.11 High pH products such as liquid soaps may be adequately preserved
without added preservative chemicals.
HURDLE TECHNOLOGY: USE OF LOW WATER ACTIVITY
Water is a requirement for the growth of all known living organisms. Formulations that
limit the availability of water help prevent microbial growth because each type of bacteria,
yeast, and mold has an optimal a
w and a range of a
w values for growth under any given set
of environmental conditions (e.g., nutrients available, temperature, pH, etc.).39 Formulators
may lower the a
w in a formulation by adding polyols (i.e., glycerin, sorbitol, propylene
glycol, butylene glycol, and pentylene glycol) and water-soluble solutes (i.e., salts, protein
hydrolysates/ammino acids, short-chain fatty acids, sugars, etc.) to achieve the desired a
w .
Unfortunately, use of effective levels of these solutes often interferes with the aesthetics of the
product (e.g., skin feel, rub-in time, tackiness, etc.). One does not need to add enough polyols
or water-soluble solutes to reach the minimum a
w values for specific microorganisms because
just adding enough to lower the a
w to 0.97 will prevent growth of pseudomonads—a major
problem in aqueous products—and this reduced a
w hurdle will work with the other hurdles
in the preservative system to prevent growth of bacteria, yeasts, and molds. The minimum
a
w values for several types of microorganisms are presented in Table V.
Low a
w products may interfere with the ability of microorganisms to grow, and the low
water availability may slow metabolism to decrease the rate of killing action by some
preservatives. Such low a
w products include eyeliners, face powders, lip rouge, lip gloss,
lipstick, and mascaras and were termed “atypical products” because different methods of
preservative efficacy testing (e.g., the use of reduced numbers of microorganisms in the
inoculum, reduced volume of inoculum, surface sampling—as opposed to taking an aliquot
from an evenly dispersed/mixed aqueous sample—and use of different sample diluents),
and different acceptance criteria may be required.40 Even if such makeup products require
“relaxed” acceptance criteria, they should be bacteriostatic/fungistatic (e.g., they should
not allow microbial growth) or be slowly bactericidal/fungicidal, and they must have an
acceptable microbial load—an aerobic plate count (APC) 100 cfu/g (10 cfu/g preferred),
or PCPC limits of 1,000 cfu/g for topical products and an APC 500 cfu/g for eye-area
and baby products,41 and no objectionable microorganisms.
Table IV
pH Requirements for Types of Microorganisms.
Type of microorganism Typical pH range for growth
Many common bacteria pH 5–9
Lactic acid bacteria pH 3.5–8.5
Many yeasts and molds pH 4.5–9
*Table adapted from Orth.31
497 Evolution and Challenges of Sustainability
HURDLE TECHNOLOGY: USE OF CHELATING AGENTS
Chelating agents such as tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) and citric acid
are used to sequester divalent metal ions that may serve as pro-oxidants that accelerate
autooxidation, cause rancidity, and color changes. Chelating agents enhance the preservative
system because they sequester divalent metal ions in the outer membrane of the Gram-
negative bacterial cell envelope, which destabilizes the envelope to make it less of a barrier
to antibiotics, preservatives, and antimicrobial chemicals. The potentiation of antibacterial
action by chelating agents is known as permeabilization synergy.31 MacGregor and Elliker
found that P. aeruginosa readily adapted to become resistant to QACs.42 However, EDTA
eliminated this acquired resistance. Orth et al. reported antimicrobial synergy against
fluorescent pseudomonads (i.e., P. aeruginosa, P. putida, P. fluorescens and P. stutzeri) in
nonionic lotions with 0.2% MP and 0.2% acrylic acid homopolymer/copolymers, which
acted as a chelating agent, and in tap water with 0.2% MP and 0.01% Na
2 EDTA.43 The
antibacterial action against P. aeruginosa depends on the strain and growth conditions.
Higher concentrations of EDTA may be needed for coliforms (i.e., E. coli) and B. cepacia, and
Kabara recommended that EDTA concentration should be up to 0.3% in some systems.44
Kabara prepared a mild preservative system that contained MP, glyceryl monolaurate, and
EDTA (1:1:1 ratio) that was effective against P. aeruginosa and E. coli when used at 0.3% in a
formulation.45 Denyer, Hugo and Harding studied synergy in preservative combinations and
found that MP plus EDTA had more than additive increases in preservative efficacy.46 Many
workers have reported potentiation/synergism of antibacterial action when EDTA is added
to chemical preservatives, and it is likely that a similar potentiation of preservative efficacy
will be obtained when EDTA is added to cosmetic formulations with multifunctional
ingredients that have antimicrobial action.
HURDLE TECHNOLOGY: USE OF SURFACTANTS
Many surfactants are multifunctional ingredients because they reduce the surface tension
of aqueous solutions in which they are used and have antimicrobial action, in part due
to destabilization of cell membranes. Cozzoli gave an extensive discussion of the role of
Table V
Minimum aw Required for Growth of Selected Bacteria, Yeasts, and Molds
Microorganism Minimum aw required for growth
Bacillus subtilis 0.90
Clostridium botulinum type A 0.95
Escherichia coli 0.95
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.97
Pseudomonas fluorescens 0.97
Salmonella spp. 0.95
Staphylococcus aureus 0.86
Aspergillus flavus 0.78
Aspergillus niger 0.77
Penicillium chrysogenum 0.79
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 0.90
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii 0.62
*Adapted from Enigl and Sorrels.39
Previous Page Next Page